Asian Charts. Through the Dark
Ages some progress was made. Moslem cartographers as well
as astronomers took inspiration from Ptolemy. However,
they knew that Ptolemy had overestimated the length of the
Mediterranean by some 200. Charts of the Indian Ocean,
bearing horizontal lines indicating parallels of latitude,
and vertical lines dividing the seas according to the
direction of the wind, were drawn by Persian and Arabian
navigators. The prime meridian separated a windward from a
leeward region and other meridians were drawn at intervals
indicating "three hours sail." This information, though
far from exact, was helpful to the sailing ship masters.
Figure 109c. Ortelius' atlas
Theatrum Orbis Terra
was published at Antwerp in 1570. One of the most
magnificent ever produced, it illustrates Europe, Africa,
and Asia with com-parative accuracy. North and South
America are poorly depicted, but Magellan's Strait is
shown. All land to the south of it, as well as Australia,
is considered part of Terra Australis Nondum Cognita (fig.
109c).
The Mercator projection (art. 305). For hundreds, perhaps'
thousands, of years cartographers drew their charts as
"plane" projections, making no use of the discoveries of
Ptolemy and Hipparchus. As the area of the known world
increased, however, the attempt to depict that larger area
on the flat surface of the plane chart brought map makers
to the realization that allowance would have to be made
for the curvature of the earth.
Gerardus Mercator (Latinized form of Gerhard Kremer) was a
brilliant Flemish geographer who recognized the need for a
better method of chart projection. In 1569 he published a
world chart which he had constructed on the principle
since known b y his name. The theory of his work was
correct, but Mercator made errors in his computation, and
because he never published a complete description of the
mathematics involved, mariners were deprived of the full
advantages of the projection for another 30 years.
Then Edward Wright published the results of his own
independent study in the matter, explaining the Mercator
projection fully and providing the table of meridional
parts which enabled all cartographers to make use of the
principle.
Wright was a mathematician at Carus College who developed
the method and table and gave them totertain navigators
for testing. After these proved their usefulness, Wright
decided upon publication, and in 1599
Certaine Errors in
Navigation Detected and Corrected was printed.
The Lambert projections.
Johann Heinrich Lambert, 1728-1777, self-educated son of
an Alsace tailor, designed a number of map projections.
Some of these are still widely used, the most renowned
being the Lambert conformal (art. 314).
110. Sailing directions.
— From earliest times there has been a demand for
knowledge of what lay ahead, and this gave rise to the
early development of sailing directions.
The
Periplus of
Scylax, written sometime between the sixth and fourth
centuries BC, is the earliest known book of this type.
Surprisingly similar to modern sailing directions, it
provided the mariner with information on distances between
ports, aids and dangers, port facilities, and other
pertinent matters. The following excerpt is typical:
Libya begins beyond the Canopic mouth of the
Nile. . . . The first people in Libya are the
Adrymachidae. From Thonis the voyage to Pharos, a desert
island (good harbourage but no drinking water), is 150
stadia. In Pharos are many harbors. But ships water at
the Marian Mere, for it is drinkable. . . . The mouth of
the bay of Plinthine to Leuce Acte (the white beach) is
a day and night's sail; but sailing round by the head of
the bay of Plinthine is twice as long.
Parts Around the World,
Pytheas' book of observations made during his epic voyage
in the fourth century BO, was another early volume of
sailing directions. His rough estimates of distances and
descriptions of coast lines would be considered crude
today, but they served as an invaluable aid to navigators
who followed him into these otherwise unknown waters.
Sailing directions
during the Renaissance. No particularly
noteworthy improvements were made in sailing directions
during the Middle Ages, but in 1490 the Portolano Rizo was
published, the first of a series of improved design. Other
early volumes of this kind appeared in France and were
called "routiers" — the rutters of the English sailor. In
1557 the Italian pilot Battista Testa Rossa published
Brieve Compendio del Arte
del Navigar, which was designed to serve the
mariner on soundings and off. It forecast the single,
all-inclusive volume that was soon to come, the Waggoner.
About. 1584 the Dutch pilot Lucas Jans Loon Waghenaer
published a volume of navigational principles, tables,
charts, and sailing directions which served as a guide for
such books for the next 200 years. In
Speighel der Leevaeret
(The Mariner's Mirror), Waghenaer gave directions and
charts for sailing the waters of the Low Countries and
later a second volume was published covering waters of the
North and Baltic seas.
These"Waggoners" met with great success and in 1588 an
English translation of the original book was made by
Anthony Ashley. During the next 30 years, 24 editions of
the book were published in Dutch, German, Latin, and
English. Other authors followed the profitable example set
by Waghenaer, and American, British, and French navigators
soon had "Waggoners" for most of the waters they sailed.
The success of these books and the resulting competition
among authors were responsible for their eventual
discontinuance. Each writer attempted to make his work
more inclusive than any other (the 1780
Atlantic Neptune
contained 257 charts of North : America alone) and the
result was a tremendous book difficult to handle. They
were too bulky, the sailing directions were unnecessarily
detailed, and the charts too large. In 1795 the British
Hydrographic Department was established, and charts and
sailing directions were issued separately. The latter,
issued for specific waters, were returned to the form of
the original
Periplus.
Modern sailing
directions. The publication of modern sailing
directions by the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office is one of
the achievements properly attributed to Matthew Fontaine
Maury. During the two decades he headed the institution,
Maury gathered data that led directly to the publication
of eight volumes of sailing directions. Today there are
more than 70 volumes providing the mariner with detailed
information on almost all foreign coasts, in addition to
ten volumes of coast pilots of the United States and its
possessions, published by the U.S. Coast and Geodetic
Survey.
111. The compass.
— Early in the history of navigation man noted that the
pole star (it may have been a Draconis then) remained
close to one point in the northern sky. This served as his
compass. When it was not visible, he used other stars, the
sun and moon, winds, clouds, and waves. The development of
the magnetic compass, perhaps a thousand years ago, and
the 20th century development of the gyro compass, offer
today's navigator a method of steering his course with an
accuracy as great as he is capable of using.
The magnetic compass (art. 623) is one of the oldest of
the navigator's instruments. Its origin is not known. In
203 BC, when Hannibal set sail from Italy, his pilot was
said to be one Pelorus. Perhaps the compass was in
use then; no one can say for certain that it was not.
There is little to substantiate the story that the Chinese
invented it, and the legend that Marco Polo introduced it
into Italy in the 13th century is almost certainly false.
It is sometimes stated that the Arabs brought it to
Europe, but this, too, is unlikely. Probably it was known
first in the west. The Norsemen of the 11th century were
familiar with it, and about 1200 a compass used by
mariners when the pole star was hidden was described by a
French poet, Guyot de Provins.
A needle thrust through a straw and floated in water in a
container comprised the earliest compass known. A 1248
writer, Hugo de Bercy, spoke of a new compass
construction, the needle "now" being supported on two
floats. Petrus Peregrinus de Maricourt, in his Epistola de
Magneto of 1269, wrote of a pivoted floating compass with
a lubber's line, and said that it was equipped with sights
for taking bearings.
The reliability of the magnetic compass of today is a
comparatively recent achievement. As late as 1826 Peter
Barlow reported to the British Admiralty "half of the
compasses in the Royal Navy were mere lumber, and ought to
be destroyed." Some 75 years ago, Lord Kelvin developed
the Admiralty type compass used today.
The compass card, according to tradition, had its
beginning when Flavin Gioja, of Amalfi, attached a sliver
of lodestone, or a magnetized needle, to a card about the
beginning of the 14th century. But, the rose on the card
is probably older than the needle. It is the wind rose of
the ancients. Primitive man naturall y named directions by
the winds. The prophet Jeremiah speaks of the winds from
the four quarters of heaven (Jer. 49:36) and Homer named
four winds---Boreas, Eurus, Notus, and Lephyrus. Aristotle
is said to have suggested a circle of 12 winds, and
Eratosthenes, who measured the world correctly, reduced
the number to eight about 200 BC. The "Tower of Winds" at
Athens, built about 100 BC, had eight sides. The Latin
rose of 12 points was common on most compasses used in the
Middle Ages.
Variation (art. 709) was well understood 200 years ago,
and navigators made allowance for it, but earliest
recognition of its existence is not known. Columbus and
even the 11th century Chinese have been given credit for
its discovery, but little proof can be offered for either
claim.
The secular change in variation was determined by a series
of magnetic observations made at Limehouse, England. In
1580 William Borough fixed the variation in that area at
approximately 11°25' east. Thirty-two years later Edmund
Gunter, professor of astronomy at Gresham College,
determined it to be 6°13' east. At first it was believed
that Borough had made an error in his work, but in 1633 a
further decrease was found, and the earth's changing
magnetic field was established.
A South Atlantic expedition was led by Edmond Halley at
the close of the 17th century to gather data and to map,
for the first time, lines of variation. In 1724 George
Graham published his observations in proof of the diurnal
change in variation. Canton determined that the change was
considerably less in winter than in summer, and about 1785
the strength of the magnetic force was shown by Paul de
Lamanon to vary in different places.
The existence of deviation (art. 709) was known to John
Smith in 1627 when he wrote of the "bittacle" as being a
"square box nailed together with wooden pinnes, because
iron nails would attract the Compasse." But no one knew
how to correct a compass for deviation until Captain
Matthew Flinders, while on a voyage to Australia in HMS
Investigator in
1801-02, discovered a method of doing so. Flinders did not
understand deviation completely, but the vertical bar he
erected to correct for it was part of the solution, and
the Flinders bar (art. 720) used toda y is a memorial to
its discoverer. Between 1839 and 1855 Sir George Airy,
then Astronomer Royal, studied the matter further and
developed combinations of permanent magnets and soft iron
masses for adjusting the compass. The introduction, by
Lord Kelvin, of short needles as compass magnets made
adjustment more precise.
The gyro compass (art. 631). The age of iron ships
demanded a compass which could be relied upon to indicate
true north at all times, free from disturbing forces of
variation and deviation.
In 1851, at the Pantheon in Paris, Leon Foucault performed
his famous pendulum experiment to demonstrate the rotation
of the earth. Foucault's realization that the swinging
pendulum would maintain the plane of its motion led him,
the following year, to develop and name the first
gyroscope, using the principle of a common toy called a
"rotascope." Handicapped by the lack of a source of power
to maintain the spin of his gyroscope, Foucault used a
microscope to observe the indication of the earth's
rotation during the short period in which his
manually-operated gyroscope remained in rotation. A gyro
compass was not practical until electric power became
available, more than 50 years later, to maintain the spin
of the gyroscope.
Elmer A. Sperry, an American, and Anschutz-Kampfe, a
German, independently invented gyro compasses during the
first decade of the 20th century. Tested first in 1911 on
a freighter operating off the East Coast of the United
States and then on American warships, Sperry's compass was
found adequate, and in the years following World War I
gyro compasses became standard equipment on all large
naval and merchant ships.
Gyro compass auxiliaries commonly used today were added
later. These include gyro repeaters, to indicate the
vessel's heading at various locations; gyro pilots, to
steer vessels automatically; course recorders, providing a
graphic record of courses steered; gyro-magnetic
compasses, which repeat headings of magnetic compasses so
located as to be least affected by deviation; and others
in the fields of fire control, aviation, and guided
missiles.
112. The log. —
Since virtually the beginning of navigation, the mariner
has attempted to determine his speed in traveling from one
point to another. The earliest method was probably by
estimate.
The oldest speed measuring device known is the Dutchman's
log. ()rally, any object which would float was thrown
overboard, on the lee side, from a point well forward, and
the time required for it to pass between two points on the
deck was noted. The time, as determined by sand glass, was
compared with the known distance along the deck between
the two points to determine the speed.
Near the end of the 16th century a line was attached to
the log, and as the line was paid out a sailor recited
certain sentences. The length of line which was paid out
during the recitation was used to determine the speed.
There is record of this method having been used as
recently as the early 17th century. In its final form this
chip log, ship log, or common log consisted of the log
chip (or icy ship), log line, log reel, and log glass. The
chip was a quadrant-shaped piece of wood weighted along
its circumference to keep it upright in the water (fig.
112). The log line was made fast to the log chip by means
of a bridle, in such manner that a sharp pull on the log
line dislodged a wooden peg and permitted the log chip to
be towed horizontally through the water, and hauled
aboard. Sometimes a stray line was attached to the log to
veer it clear of the ship's wake. In determining speed,
the observer counted the knots in the log line which was
paid out during a certain time. The length of line between
knots and the number of seconds required for the sand to
run out were changed from time to time as the accepted
length of the mile was altered.
The chip log has been superseded by patent logs that
register on dials. However, the common log has left its
mark on modern navigation, as the use of the term knot to
indicate a speed of one nautical mile per hour dates from
this device. There is evidence to support the opinion that
the expression "dead reckoning" had its origin in
this same device, or perhaps in the earlier Dutchman's
log. There is logic in attributing "dead" reckoning to a
reckoning relative to an object "dead" in the water.
written by Nathaniel Bowditch and published in 1802.
FIGURE 120. A Babylonian map of about 500 BC. The
Babylonians believed the earth
to be a flat disk encircled by a salt water river.
But seafarers knew that the last to be seen of a ship as
it disappeared over the horizon was the masthead. They
recognized the longer summer days in England when they
sailed to the tin mines of Cornwall, as early as 900 BC.
In that "north land" the Mediterranean sailors noticed
that the pole star was higher in the sky and the lower
southern constellations were no longer visible. When
Thales invented the
gnomonic projection, about 600 BC, he must have believed
the earth to be a sphere. Two centuries later
Aristotle wrote that the earth's shadow on the moon during
an eclipse was always circular. Archimedes (287-212 BC)
used a glass celestial globe with a smaller terrestrial
globe inside it. Although the average man has understood
the spherical nature of the earth for only a comparatively
short period, learned astronomers have accepted the fact
for more than 25 centuries.
121. Celestial mechanics.
— Among astronomers the principal question for 2,000
years was not the shape of the earth, but whether it or
the sun was the center of the universe. A stationary earth
seemed logical to the early Greeks, who calculated that
daily rotation would produce a wind of several hundred
miles per hour at the equator.
Failing to realize that the earth's atmosphere turns with
it, they considered the absence of such a wind proof that
the earth was stationary.
The belief among the ancients was that all celestial
bodies moved in circles about the earth. However, the
planets — the "wanderers," as they were called —
contradicted this theory by their irregular motion. In the
fourth century BC Eudoxus of Cnidus attempted to account
for this by suggesting that planets were attached to
concentric spheres which rotated about the earth at,
varying speeds. The plan of epicycles, the theory of the
universe which was commonly accepted for 2,000 years, was
first proposed by Apollonius of Perga in the third century
BC. Ptolemy accepted and amplified the plan, explaining it
in his famous books, the
Almagest and
Cosmographia. According
to Ptolemy, the planets moved at uniform speeds in small
circles, the centers of which moved at, uniform speeds in
circles about the earth (fig. 121).
At first the Ptolemaic theory was accepted without
question, but as the years passed, forecasts based upon it
proved to be inaccurate. By the time the Alfonsine Tables
were published in the 13th century AD, a growing number of
astronomers considered the Ptolemaic doctrine
unacceptable. However, Purbach, Regiomontanus, Bernhard
Walther of Kuremberg, and even Tycho Brahe in the latter
part of the 16th
century, were among those who tried to reconcile the
earth-centered epicyclic plan to the observed phenomena of
the heavens.
As early as the sixth centur y BC, a brotherhood founded
by Pythagoras, a Greek philosopher, proposed that the
earth was round and self-supported in space, and that it,
the other planets, the sun, and the moon revolved about, a
central fire which they
called
Hestia,
the hearth of the universe. The sun and the moon, they
said, shone by reflected light from Hestia.
The central fire was never located, however, and a few
hundred years later Aristarchus of Samos advanced a
genuine heliocentric theory. He denied the existence of
Hestia and placed the sun at the center of the universe,
correctly considering it to be a star which shone by
itself. The Hebrews apparently understood the correct,
relationship at least as early as Abraham (about 2000 BC),
and the early inhabitants of the Western Hemisphere
probably knew of it before the Europeans did.
The Ptolemaic theory was generally accepted until its
inability to predict future positions of the planets could
no longer be reconciled. Its replacement by the
heliocentric theory is credited principall y to Nicolaus
Copernicus (or Koppernigk). After studying mathematics at
the University of Cracow, Copernicus went to Bologna,
where he attended the astronomical lectures of Domenicao
Maria Novara, an advocate of the Pythagorean theory.
Further study in Martianus Copella's Satyricori, which
includes a discussion of the heliocentric doctrine,
convinced him that the sun was truly the center of the
universe.
Until the year of his death Copernicus tested his belief
by continual observations, and in that year, 1543, he
published
De
Revolutiunibus Orbium Coelestium. In it he said
that the earth rotated on its axis daily and revolved in a
circle about the sun once each year. He placed the other
planets in circular orbits about the sun also, recoguizing
that Mercury and Venus were closer than the earth, and the
others farther out. He concluded that the stars were
motionless in space and that the moon moved circularly
about the earth. His conclusions did not become widely
known until nearly a century later, when Galileo
publicized them. Today, "heliocentric" and "Copernican"
are synonymous terms used in describing the character of
the solar system.
122. Other early
discoveries. — A knowledge of the principal
motions of the planets permitted reasonably accurate
predictions of future positions. Other, less spectacular
data, however, were being established to help round out
the knowledge astronomers needed before they could produce
the highly accurate almanacs known today.
More than a century before the birth of Christ, Hipparchus
discovered the preceSWon of the equinoxes (art. 1419) by
comparing his own observations of the stars with those
recorded by Tirnocharis and Aristyllus about 300 BC.
Hipparchus cataloged more than a thousand stars, and
compiled an additional list of time-keeping stars Which
differed in sidereal hour angle by 15° (one hour),
accurate to 15'. A spherical star map, or planisphere, and
a celestial globe were among the equipment he designed.
However, his instruments did not permit measurements of
such precision that stellar Parallax could be detected,
and, consequently, he advocated the geocentric theory of
the universe.
Three centuries later Ptolemy examined and confirmed
Hipparclius' discovery of precession. He published a
catalog in which lie arranged the stars by constellations
and gave the magnitude, declination, and right ascension
(art. 1426) of each. Following Hipparclius, Ptolemy
determmined longitudes by eclipses. In the
Ailmagest he included
the plane and spherical trigonometry tables which
Hipparchus had developed, mathematical tables, and an
explanation of the circumstances upon which the equation
of time (art. 1912) depends.
The next thousand years saw little progress in the science
of astronomy. Alexandria continued as a center of learning
for several hundred years after Ptolemy, but succeeding
astronomers at the observatory confined their work to
comments on his great books. The long twilight of the Dark
Ages had begun.
Alexandria was captured and destro yed by the Arabs in AD
640, and for the next 500 years Moslems exerted the
primary influence in astronomy. Observatories were erected
at Baghdad and Damascus during the ninth century. Ibn
Yunis' observatory near Cairo gathered the data for the
Tlakiniite tables in the 11th century. Earlier, the
Spanish, under Moorish tutelage, set up schools of
astronomy at Cordova and Toledo.
123. Modern astronomy
may be said to date from Copernicus, although it was not
until the invention of the telescope, about 1608, that
precise measurement of the positions and motions of
celestial bodies was possible.
Galileo Galilei, an Italian, made outstanding
contributions to the cause of astronomy, and these served
as a basis for the work of later men, particularly Isaac
Newton. He discovered Jupiter 's satellites, providing
additional opportunities for determining longitude on
land. He maintained that it is natural for motion to
be uniform and in it straight line and that a force is
required only when direction or speed is changing.
Galileo's support of the heliocentric theory, his
use and improvement of the telescope, and particularly the
clarity and completeness of his records provided firm
footing for succeeding astronomers.
Early in the 17th century , before the invention of the
telescope, Tycho Brahe found the planet Mars to be in a
position differing by as much as 8' from that required by
the geocentric theory . When the telescope became
available, astronomers learned that the apparent diameter
of the sun varied during the year, indicating that the
earth's distance from the sun varies, and that its orbit
is not circular.
Johannes Kepler, a German who had succeeded Brahe and who
was attempting to account for his 8' discrepancy ,
published in 1609 two of astronomy's most important
doctrines, the law of equal areas, and the law of
elliptical orbits. Nine years later he announced his
third law, relating the periods of revolution of any two
planets to their respective distances from the sun (art.
1407).
Kepler's discoveries provided it mathematical basis by
which more accurate tables of astronomical data were
computed for the maritime explorers of the age. His
realization that the sun is the controlling power of the
system and that the orbital planes of the planets pass
through its center almost led film to the discover y of
the law of gravitation.
Sir Isaac Newton reduced Kepler's conclusions to the
universal law of gravitation (art. 1407) when he published
his three laws of motions in 1687. Because the planets
exert forces one upon the other, their orbits do not agree
exactly with Kepler's laws. Newton's work
compensated for this and, as it the astronomer was able to
forecast with greater accuracy the positions of the
celestial bodies. The navigator benefited through
more exact tables of astronomical data.
Between the years 1764 and 1784, the Frenchmen Lagrange
and Laplace conclusively proved the solar system's
mechanical stability.
Nathaniel Bowditch translated and commented upon Laplace's
Mécanique Céleste,
bringing it up-to-date. Prior to their work this stability
had been questioned due to apparent inconsistencies in the
motions of some of the planets. After their
demonstrations, men were convinced and could turn to other
important work necessary to refine and improve the
navigator's almanac.
But there were real, as well as apparent, irregularities
of motion which could not be explained by the law of
gravitation alone. By this law the planets describe
ellipses about the sun, and these orbits are repeated
indefinitely, except as the other planets influence the
orbits of each by their own gravitational pull. Urbain
Leverrier, one-time Director of the Paris Observatory,
found that the line of apsides of Mercury was
advancing 43" per century faster than it should, according
to the law of gravitation and the positions of other known
planets. In an attempt to compensate for the resulting
errors in the predicted positions of the planet, he
suggested that there must be a mass of circulating matter
between the sun and Mercury. No such circulating matter
has been found, however, and Leverrier's discovery is
attributed to a shortcoming of Newton's law, as
explained by Albert Einstein.
In Einstein's hands, Leverrier's 43" became a fact as
powerful as Brahe's 8' had been in the hands of Kepler.
Early in the 20th century, Einstein announced the theory
of relativity (art. 1407). He stated that for the planets
to revolve about the sun is natural, and gravitational
force is unnecessary for this, and he asserted that there
need be no circulating matter to account for the motion of
the perihelion of Mercury as this, too, is in the natural
order of things. Calculated from his theory, the
correction to the previously computed motion of the
perihelion in 100 years is 42".9.
Prior to Einstein's work, other discoveries had helped
round out man's knowledge of the universe.
Aberration (art.
1417), discovered by James Bradley about 1726, accounted
for the apparent shifting of the stars throughout the
year, due to the combined orbital speed of the earth and
the speed of light. Twenty years later Bradley described
the periodic wobbling of the earth's axis, called nutation
(art. 1417), and its effect upon precession of the
equinoxes.
Meanwhile, in 1718 Edmond Halley, England's second
Astronomer Royal, detected a motion of the stars, other
than that caused by precession, that led him to
conclude that they, too, were moving. By studying the
works of the Alexandrian astronomers, he found that some
of the most prominent stars had changed their positions by
as much as 32'. Jacques Cassini gave Halley's discovery
further support when he found, a few years later, that the
declination of Arcturus had changed 5' in the 100 years
since Brahe made his observations. This proper motion
(art. 1414) is motion in addition to that caused by
precession, nutation, and aberration.
Sir John Herschel, the great astronomer who discovered the
planet Uranus, about 1800 proved that the solar system is
moving toward the constellation Hercules. As early as 1828
Herschel advocated the establishment of a standard time
system. Neptune was discovered in 1826 after its position
had been predicted by the Frenchman Urbain Leverrier.
Based upon the work of Percival Lowell, an American, Pluto
was identified in 1930. Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto are of
little concern to the navigator.
A more recent discovery may well have greater navigational
significance. This is the existence of sources of
electromagnetic energy in the sky in the form of radio
stars (art. 1414). The sun has been found to transmit
energy of radio frequency, and instruments have been built
which are capable of tracking it across the sky regardless
of weather conditions.
Maryland State Archives
FIGURE 124a. — The ancient astrolabe, one of the
earliest altitude measuring instruments.
124. Sextant. —
Prior to the development of the magnetic compas, the
navigator used the heavenly bodies chiefly as guides by
which to steer. The compass, however, led to more
frequent long voyages on the open sea, and the need for a
vertical-angle measuring device which could be used for
determining altitude, so that latitude could be
found.
Probably the first such device used at: sea was the common
quadrant, the simplest form of all such instruments. Made
of wood, it was a fourth part of it circle, hold vertical
by means of it plumb bob. An observation made with this
instruruent at sea a two- or three-man job. This device
was probably used ashore for centuries before it went to
sea, although its earliest use by the mariner is unknown.
Invented perhaps by Apollonius of Perga in the third
century BC, the astrolabe (fig. 124a) — from the
Greek for
star
and
to take — had
been
made portable by the Arabs possibly as early as AD
700. It was in the hands of Christian pilots by the
end the 13th century, often as an elaborate and beautiful
creation wrought of precious metals. Some astrolabes could
be used as star finders (art. 2210) by fitting all
engraved plate to one side. Large astrolabes were among
the chief instruntents of 15th and 16th century
observatories, but the value of this instrument at sea was
limited.
The principle of the astrolabe was similar to that of the
common quadrant, the astrolabe consisted of it metal disk,
graduated in degrees, to which a movable sight vane was
attached. In using the astrolabe, which may be likened to
a pelorus held on its side, the navigator adjusted the
sight vane until it was in line with the star, and then
read the zenith distance from the scale. As with the
common quadrant, the vertical was established by plumb
bob.
Three men were needed to make an observation with the
astrolabe (one held the instrument by a ring at its top,
another aligned the sight vane with the body, a third made
the reading) and even then the least rolling or pitching
of a vessel caused large acceleration errors in
observations. Therefore, navigators were forced to abandon
the plumb bob and make the horizon their reference.
Figure 124b. — The
cross-staff, the first instrument to utilize the visible
horizon in making celestial observations.
The cross-staff (fig. 124b) was the first instrument which
utilized the visible horizon in making celestial
observations. The instrument consisted of a long, wooden
shaft upon which one of several cross-pieces was mounted
perpendicularly. The cross-pieces were of
various lengths, the one being used depending upon
the angle to be measured. The navigator fitted the
appropriate cross-piece on the shaft and, holding one end
of the shaft beside his eye, adjusted the cross until its
lower end was in line with the horizon and its upper end
with the body. The shaft was calibrated to indicate the
altitude of the body observed.
University of Southern Maine
FIGURE 124c.--The backstaff, or sea quadrant, a favorite
instrument of American colonial navigators.
In using the cross-staff, the navigator was forced to look
at the horizon and the celestial body at the same time. In
1590 John Davis, author of The Seaman's Secrets, invented
the backstaff (fig. 124c) or sea quadrant. He was one of
the few practical seamen (Davis Strait is named for him,
in honor of his attempt to find the Nort Passage} to
invent a navigational device. The backstatf marked a long
advance and was particularly popular among American
colonial navigators.
In using this instrument, the navigator turned his back to
the sun and aligned its shadow with true horizon.
The backstaff had two arcs, and the sum of the
values shown on each was the altitude of the sun. Later,
this instrument was fitted with a mirror to permit
observations of bodies other than the sun.
Figure 124A. The nocturnal, an instrument used to
determine latitude by an observation of Polaris.
Another instrument developed about the same time was the
nocturnal. Its purpose was to provide the mariner
with the appropriate correctionl to be made to the
altitude of Polaris to determine latitude. By sighting on
Polaris through the hole in the center of the instrument
and adjusting the movable arm so that it pointed
at Kochab, the navigator could read the correction
from the instrument. Most nocturnals had an
additional outerdisk graduated for the months and days of
the year and by adjusting this the navigator could also
determine solar time.
Tycho Brahe designed several instruments with arcs of 60°,
having one fixed sigh another movable one. He called
the instruments sextants the name is now commonly applied
to all alt itude-measureing devices used by the navigator
(ch. XV). In 1700 Sir Newton sent to Edmond Haller, the
Astronomer Royal, a description of a device having
double-reflecting mirros, the principle of
modern marine sextant. However, this was not made
public until after somewhat similar instruments had
been made in 1730 by Englishman John Hadley, and the
American Thomas Godfrey
The original instrument constructed by Hadley was, in
fact, an
octant,
but due to the double-reflection principle it
measured angles up to one-fourth of a circle, or 90°.
Godfrey 's instrument is reported to have been a
quadrant and so
could measure a through 180°. The two men received
equal awards from England's Royal Society, as their work
was considered to be a case of simultaneous invention,
although Haldey probably preceded Godfrey by a few months
in the actual construction of his sextant. In the
next few years both instruments were successfully tested
at sea, but 20 years or more passed before the
navigator gave up his backstaff or sea quadrant for
the new device. In 1733 Hadley attached a spirit
level to a quadrant, and with it was abe to measure
altitudes without reference to the horizon. Some
years late first bubble sextant (art. 1513) was developed.
Pierre Vernier, in 1631, had attached to the limb of a
quadrant a second, smaller graduated arc, thereby
permitting angles to be measured more accurately, and this
device was incorporated in all later angle-measuring
instruments.
The sextant has remained practically unchanged since its
invention more than two centuries ago. The only notable
improvements have been the addition of an endless tangent
screw and a micrometer drum, both having been added during
the 20th century.
125. Determining
latitude. — The ability to determine longitude at
sea is comparatively modern, but latitude has been
available for thousands of years.
Meridian transit of the
sun. Long before the Christian era, astronomers
had determined the sun's declination for each day of the
year, and prepared tables listing the ata. This was a
comparatively simple matter, for the zenith distance
obtained by use of a shadow cast by the sun on the day of
the winter solstice could be subtracted from that obtained
on the day of the summer solstice to determine the range
of the sun's declination, about 47°. Half of this is the
sun's maximum declination, which could then be applied to
the zenith distance recorded on either day to determine
the latitude of the place. Daily observations thereafter
enabled the ancient astronomers too construct reasonably
accurate declination tables.
Such tables were available long before the average
navigator was ready to use team, but certainly by the 15th
century experienced seamen were determining their latitude
at sea to within one or two degrees. In his 1594 The
Seaman's Secrets, Davis made use of his experience in high
latitudes to explain the method of determining latitude by
lower transit observations of the sun.
Ex-meridian observation
of the sun. The possibility of overcast skies at
the one time each day when the navigator could get a
reliable observation for latitude led to the development
of the "ex-meridian" sight. Another method, involving two
sights taken with a considerable time interval between,
had previously been known, but the mathematics were so
involved that it is doubtful that many seamen made use of
it.
There are two methods by which ex-meridian observations
can be solved. The direct process was the more accurate,
although it required a trigonometrical solution. By the
latter part of the 19th century, tables were introduced
which made the method of reduction to the meridian
more practical and, when occasion demands such an
observation, this is the method generally used today.
However, with the development of line of position methods
and the modern inspection table, ex-meridian observations
have lost much of their popularity.
Latitude by Polaris.
First use of the pole star to determine latitude is not
known, but many centuries ago seamen who used it as a
guide by which to steer were known tocomment upon its
change of altitude as they sailed north or south.
By Columbus' time some navigators were using Polaris to
determine latitude, and with the invention of the
nocturnal late in the 16th century, providing corrections
to the observed altitude, the method came into more
general use. The development of the chronometer in
the 18th century permitted exact corrections, and this
made determination of latitude by Polaris a common
practice. Even today, more than a century after discovery
of the celestial line of position, the method is still in
use. The modern inspection table has eliminated the need
for meridian observations as a special method for
determining latitude. Perhaps when the almanacs and sight
reduction tables make the same provision for solution of
Polaris sights as they do for any other navigational star,
this last of the special methods will cease to be used for
general navigation. But customs die slowly, and one as
well established as that of position finding in terms of
separate latitude and longitude observations — instead of
lines of position — is not likely to disappear completely
for many years to come.
126. The search for a
method of "discovering" longitude at sea. —
A statement once quite common was, "The
navigator always knows his latitude." A more accurate
statement would have been, "The navigator never knows his
longitude." In 1594 Davis wrote: "Now there be some
that are very inquisitive to have a way to get
the longitude, but that is too tedious for seamen,
since it requireth the deep knowledge of astronomy,
wherefore I would not have any man think that the
longitude is to be at sea by any instrument, so let no
seamen trouble themselves with any such rule but let
them keep a perfect account and reckoning of the way of
their ship." In speaking of conditions of his day, he was
correct, for it was not until the 19th century that the
average navigator was able to determine his longitude with
accuracy.
Parallel sailing.
Without knowledge of his longitude, the navigator of old
it necessary on an ocean crossing to sail northward or
southward to the latitude ` destination, and then to
follow that parallel of latitude until the destinatio
reached, even though this might take him far out of his
way. Because of this pr parallel sailing was an important
part of the navigator's store of knowledge. method was a
crude one, however, and the time of landfall was often in
error matter of days, .and, in extreme cases, even weeks.
Eclipses. Almost
as early as the rotation of the earth was established,
astron recognized that longitude could be determined by
comparing local time with t. the reference meridian. The
problem was the determination of time at the. ref
meridian. One of the first methods proposed was that of
observing the disappeara; Jupiter's satellites as they
were eclipsed by their planet. This method, ori^ proposed
by Galileo for use on land, required the ability to
observe and identi satellites by using a powerful
telescope, knowledge of the times at which the e+ would
take place, and the skill to keep the instrument directed
at the bodies aboard a small vessel on the high seas.
Although used in isolated cases for years, the method was
not satisfactory at sea, due largely to the difficulty of
oh tion (some authorities recommended use of a telescope
as long as 18 or 19 feet) ar lack of sufficiently accurate
predictions.
Variation of the compass
was seriously considered as a method of detern longitude
for 200 years or more. Faleiro, Magellan's advisor,
believed it could utilized, and, until the development of
the chronometer, work was carried on to p the theory.
Although there is no simple relationship between variation
and long those who advocated the method felt certain that
research and investigation eventually provide the answer.
Many others were convinced that such a so! did not exist.
:In 1676 William Bond published The Longitude Found, in
whi stated that the latitude of a place and its variation
could be referred to the meridian to determine longitude.
Two years later Peter Blackborrow rebutted with
The Longitude Not Found.
Variation was put to good use in determining the nearness
to land by shipm familiar with the waters they plied, but
as the solution to the longitude problem i a failure, and
with the improvement of lunar distance methods and the
inventi the chronometer, interest in the method waned. If
it had been possible to provid mariner with an accurate
chart of variation, and to keep it up-to-date, a mea
establishing an approximate line of position in areas
where the gradient is large v have resulted; in many cases
this would have established longitude if latitude known.
Lunar distances.
The first method widely used at sea to determine long with
some accuracy was that of lunar distances (art.. 131), by
which the navigator determined GMT by noting the position
of the relatively fast-moving moon among the stars. Both
Regiomontanus, in 1472, and John Werner, in 1514, have
been credited with being the first to propose the use of
the lunar distance method. At least one source states that
Amerigo Vespucci, in 1497, determined longitude using the
moon's position
relative to that of another body. One of the principal
reasons for establishing the Royal Observatory at
Greenwich was to conduct the observations necessary to
provide more accurate predictions of the future positions
of the moon. Astronomers, including the Astronomers Royal,
favored this method, and half a century after the
invention of the chronometer it was still being perfected.
In 1802 Nathaniel Bowditch simplified the method and its
explanation, thus eliminating much of the mystery
surrounding it and making it understandable to the average
mariner. Following Bowditch, the navigator was able to
head more or less directly toward his destination, rather
than travel the many additional miles often required in
"running down the latitude" and then using parallel
sailing. An explanation of the lunar distance method, and
tables for its use, were carried in the American Practical
Narigator until 1914.
The Board of Longitude.
The lunar distance method, using the data and equipment
available early in the 18th century, was far from
satisfactory. Ships, cargoes, and lives were lost because
of inaccurately-determined longitudes. During the Age of
Discovery, Spain and Holland posted rewards for solution
to the problem, but in vain. When 2,000 men were lost as a
squadron of British men-of-war ran aground on a foggy
night in 1707, officers of the Royal Navy and Merchant
Navy petitioned Parliament for action. As a result, the
Board of Longitude was established in 1714, empowered to
reward the person who could solve the problem of
"discovering" longitude at sea. A voyage to the West
Indies and back was to be the test of proposed methods
which were deemed worthy. The discoverer of a system which
could determine the longitude within 1° by the end of the
voyage was to receive £10,000; within 40', £15,000; and
within 30', £20,000. These would be handsome sums today.
In the 18th century they were fortunes.
127. Evolution of the
chronometer. — Many and varied were the
solutions proposed for finding longitude, and as the
different methods were found unsatisfactory, it became
increasingly apparent that the problem was one of keeping
the time of the prime meridian. But the development of a
device that would keep accurate time during a long voyage
seemed to most men to be beyond the realm of possibility.
Astronomers were flatly opposed to the idea and felt that
the problem was properly theirs. There is even some
evidence to indicate that the astronomers of the Board of
Longitude made unfair tests of chronometers submitted to
them.
Christian Huygens (1629-95), a Dutch scientist and
mathematician, made a number of contributions of great
value in the field of astronom y, but his most memorable
work, to the navigator, was his attempt at constructing a
perfect timepiece. It was probably Galileo who first
suggested using a pendulum in keeping time. Huygens
realized that an error would result from the use of a
simple pendulum, however, and he devised one in which the
bob hung from a double cord that passed between two plates
in such a way that it traced a cycloidal path.
In 1660 Huygens built his first chronometer. The
instrument utilized his cycloidal pendulum, actuated by a
spring. To compensate for rolling and pitching, Huygens
mounted the clock in gimbals. Two years later the
instrument was tested at sea, with promising results. The
loss of tension in the spring as it ran down was the major
weakness in this clock. Huygens compensated for this by
attaching oppositely-tapered cones and a chain to the
spring. A 1665 sea test of the new timepiece showed
greater accuracy, but still not enough for determination
of longitude. In 1674 he constructed a chronometer with a
special balance and long balance-spring, Although it was
the best marine timepiece then known, Huygens' last clock
was also unsuited for use at sea due to the error caused
by temperature changes.
John Harrison was a carpenter's son, horn in Yorkshire in
1693. He followed his father's trade during his youth, but
soon became interested in the repair and construction of
clocks. At the age of 20 lie completed his first
timekeeper, a pendulum-type clock with wooden wheels and
pinions. Harrison's gridiron pendulum, one which
maintained its length despite temperature changes, was
designed about 1720, and contained alternate iron and
brass rods to eliminate distortion. Until the time that
metal alloys having small coefficients of temperature
expansion were developed, Harrison's invention was the
type of pendulum used by almost all clockmakers.
© Crown copyright, National Maritime Museum
Figure 127 Harrison's No. 1 chronometer. The first
of four time-keepers constructed by Harrison,
this clock weighs 65 pounds.
By 1728 Harrison felt ready to take his pendulum, an
escapement he had invented, and plans for his own marine
timepiece before the Board of Longitude. In London,
however, George Graham, a famous clockmaker, advised him
to first construct the timekeeper. Harrison did, and
in (735 he submitted his No. 1 chronometer (fig. 127).
The Board authorized a sea trial aboard HMS
Centurion. The
following year, that vessel sailed for Lisbon with
Harrison's clock on board, and upon her return, the error
was found to he three minutes of longitude, a performance
which astounded members of the Board. But the chronometer
was awkward and heavy, being enclosed in glass and
weighing some 65 pounds, and the Board voted to give
Harrison only £500, to be used in producing a more
practical timepiece.
During the next few years he constructed two other
chronometers, which were stronger and less complicated,
although there is no record of their being tested by the
Board of Longitude. Harrison continued to devote his life
to the construction of an accurate clock to be used in
determining longitude, and finally, as he approached old
age, he developed his No. 4. Again he went before the
Board, and again a test was arranged. In November of 1761,
HMS
Deptford
sailed for Jamaica with No. 4
aboard, in the custody of Harrison's son, William. On
arrival, after a passage lasting two months, the watch was
only nine seconds slow (23; minutes of longitude). In
January of 1762 it was placed aboard HMS
Merlin for the return
voyage to England. When the
Merlin anchored in
English waters in April of that year, the total error
shown by the chronometer was 1 minute, 54.5 seconds. This
is equal to less than a half degree of longitude, or less
than the minimum error prescribed by the Board for the
largest prize. Harrison applied for the full £20,000, but
the Board, led by the Astronomer Royal, allowed him only a
fourth of that, and insisted on another test.
William Harrison sailed again with No. 4 for Barbados in
March of 1764, and throughout the almost four-months-long
voyage the chronometer showed an error of only 54 seconds,
or 13.5 minutes of longitude. The astronomers of the Board
reluctantly joined in a unanimous declaration that
Harrison's timepiece had exceeded all expectations, but
they still would not pay him the full reward. An
additional £5,000 were paid on the condition that plans be
submitted for the construction of similar chronometers.
Even when this was done, the Board delayed payment further
by having one of its members construct a timepiece from
the plans. Not until 1773, Harrison's 80th year, was the
rest of the reward paid, and only then because of
intervention by the king himself.
Pierre LeRoy, a great French clockmaker, constructed a
chronometer in 1766 which has since been the basis for all
such instruments. LeRoy's several inventions made his
chronometer a timepiece which has been described as a
"masterpiece of simplicity, combined with efficiency."
Others to contribute to the art of watchmaking included
Ferdinand Berthoud of France and Thomas Mudge of England,
each of whom developed new escapements. The balance wheel
was improved by John Arnold, who invented the escapement
acting in one direction only, substantially that used
today. Acting independently, Thomas Earnshaw invented a
similar escapement. He built the first reliable
chronometer at a relatively low price. The chronometer the
Board of Longitude had made from Harrison's plans cost
£450; Earnshaw's cost £45.
Timepieces designed to provide the navigator with
information other than time were popular a century or more
ago. One showed the times of high and low water, the state
of the tide at any time, and the phases of the moon;
another gave the equation of time and the apparent motions
of the stars and planets; a third offered the position of
the sun and both mean and sidereal times. But the
chronometers produced by LeRoy and Earnshaw were the ones
of greatest value to the navigator; they gave him a simple
and reliable method of determining his longitude.
Time signals, which permit the mariner at sea to check the
error in his chronometer, are essentially a 20th century
development. Telegraphic time signals were inaugurated in
the United States at the end of the Civil War, and enabled
ships to check their chronometers in port by time ball
signals. Previously, the Navy's "standard"chronometer had
been carried from port to port to allow such comparison.
In their most advanced form, time balls were dropped by
telegraphic action. In 1904 the first official "wireless"
transmission of time signals began from a naval station at
Navesink, N. J. These were low-power signals which could
be heard for a distance of about 50 miles. Five years
later the range had been doubled, and, as other nations
began sending time signals, the navigator was soon able to
check his chronometer around the world.
The search for longitude was ended.
128. Establishment of the
prime meridian. Until the beginning of the
19th century, there was little uniformity among
cartographers as to the meridian from which longitude was
measured. The navigator was not paricularly concerned, as
he could not determine his longitude, anyway.
Ptolemy, in the second century AD, had measured longitude
eastward from a reference meridian two degrees west of the
Canary Islands. In 1493 Pope Alexander VI drew it line in
the Atlantic west of the Azores to divide the territories
of Spain and Portugal and for many years this meridian was
used by chart makers the two countries. 1570 the
Dutch cartographer Ortelius used the easternmost of the
Cape Verde Islands. John Davis, in his 1594
The Seaman's Secrets,
said the Isle of Fez in the Canaries was used because
there the variation was zero. Mariners paid little
attention, however, and often reckoned their longitude
from several different capes and ports during a voyage,
depending upon their last reliable fix.
The meridian of London was used as early as 1676, and over
the years its popularity grew as England's maritime
interests increased. The system of measuring longitude
both east and west through 180° may have first appeared in
the middle of the 18th century. Toward the end of that
century, as the Greenwich Observatory increased in
prominence, English map makers began using the meridian of
that observatory as a reference. The publication by the
Observatory of the first British Nautical Almanac in 1767
further entrenched Greenwich as the prime meridian. A
later and unsuccessful attempt was made in 1810 to
establish Washington as the prime meridian for American
navigators and cartographers. At an international
conference held in Washington in 1884 the meridian of
Greenwich was officially established, by the 25 nations in
attendance, as the prime meridian. Toda y all maritime
nations have designated the Greenwich meridian the prime
meridian, except in a few cases where local references are
used for certain harbor charts.
129. Astronomical
observatories. — Thousands of years before the
birth of Christ, crude observatories existed, and
astronomers constructed primitive tables which were the
forerunners of modern almanacs. The famous observatory at
Alexandria, the first "true" observatory , was constructed
in the third century BC, but the Egyptians, as well as the
Babylonians and Chinese, had already studied the heavens
for many centuries. The armillary sphere (fig. 129a) was
the principal instrument used by the early astronomers. It
consisted of a skeleton sphere with several movable rings
which could be adjusted to indicate the orbits of the
various celestial bodies. One source attributes the
invention of the armillary sphere to Eratosthenes in the
third century BC; another says the Chinese knew it 2,000
veal's earlier, as well as the water clock and a form of
astrolabe. The Alexandrian observator y was the seat of
astronomical learning in the western world for several
centuries, and there Hipparchus discovered the precession
of the equinoxes, and Ptolemy did the work which led to
his
Almagest.
Astronomical study did not cease entirely during the Dark
Ages. The Arabians erected observatories at Baghdad and
Damascus in the nineth century AD, and observatories
in Cairo and northwestern Persia followed. The Moors
brought the astronomical knowledge of the Arabs into
Spain, and the
Toledan
Tables of 1080 resulted front awakening of
scientific interest that brought about the establishment
of schools of astronomy at Cordova and Toledo in the tenth
century.
Encyclopedia Britannica, 1877
FIGURE 129a.—An armillary sphere, one of the most
important
instruments of the ancient astronomers.
The great voyages of western discovery began early in the
15th century, and chief among those who recognized the
need for greater precision in navigation was Prince Henry
"The Navigator" of Portugal. About 1420 he had an
observatory constructed at Sagres, on the southern tip of
Portugal, so that more accurate information might be
available to his captains. Henry's hydrographic
expeditions added to the geographical knowledge of the
mariner, and he was responsible for the simplification of
many navigational instruments.
The Sagres observatory was rudimentary, however, and not
until 1472 was the first complete observatory built in
Europe. In that year Bernard Walther, a wealthy
astronomer, constructed the Nuremberg Observatory, and
placed Regiomontanus in charge. Regiomontanus, born Johann
MUller, contributed a wealth of astronomical data of the
greatest importance to the navigator.
The observatory at Cassel, built in 1561, had a revolving
dome and an instrument capable of measuring altitude and
azimuth at, the same time. Tycho Brahe's Uranihurgum
Observatory, located on the Danish island Hveen, was
opened in 1576, and the results of his observations
contributed greatly to the navigator's knowledge.
Prior to the discovery of the telescope, the
astronomer could increase the accuracy of his observations
only by using larger instruments. Brahe used a quadrant
with a radius of 19 feet, with which lie could measure
altitudes to 0'.6, an unprecedented degree of precision at
that time. He also had an instrument with which he could
determine altitude and azimuth simultaneously (fig. 129b).
After Brahe, Kepler made use of the observatory and
his predecessor's records in determining the laws which
bear his name.
The telescope, the modern astronomer's most important
tool, was invented by Hans Lippershey about 1608. Galileo
heard of Lippershey's invention, and soon improved
upon it. In 1610 he discovered the four great moons
of Jupiter, which led to the "longitude by eclipse" method
successfully used ashore for many years and
experimented with at sea. With the 32 power
telescope he eventually built, Galileo was able to observe
clearly the motions of sun spots, by which he proved that
the sun rotateson its axis. In Paris, in 1671, the French
National Observatorty was established.
Greenwich Royal
Observatory. England had no
early privately-supported observatory such as those
on the continent. The need for navigational
advancement was ignored by Henry VIII and Elizabeth I, but
in 1675 Charles II, at the urging of John Flamsteed, Jonas
Moore, Le Sieur de Saint-Pierre, and Christopher Wren,
established the Greenwich Royal Observatory. Charles
limited construction costs to £500, and appointed
Flamsteed the first Astronomer Royal, at an annual
salary of £100. The equipment available in the early
years of the observatory consisted of two clocks, a
"sextant" of seven-foot radius, a quadrant of three-foot
radius, two telescopes, and the star catiilog published
almost a century before by Tycho Brahe Thirteen years
passed before Flamstead had an instrument with which he
could determine his latatude accurately. In 1690 a
transit instrument equipped with a telescope and vernier
was invented by Romer, and he later added a verticle
circle to the device. This enabled the astronomer to
determine declination and right ascension at the same
time. One of these instruments was added to the equipment
at Greenwich in 1721, replacing the huge quadrant
previously used. The development and perfection of the
chronometer in the next hundred years added further to the
accuracy of observations.
Other national observatories were constructed in the years
that followed; at Berlin in 1705, St. Petersburg in 1725,
Palermo in 1790, Cape of Good Hope in 1820, Parrametta in
New South Wales in 1822, and Sydney in 1855.
U. S. Naval Observatory.
The first observatory in the United States is said
to have been built in 1831-1832 at Chapel Hill, N.C. The
Depot of Charts and Instruments, established in 1830, was
the agency from which the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office
and the Naval Observatory evolved 36 years later. Under
Lieutenant Charles Wilkes, the second Officer-in-Charge,
the Depot about 1835 installed a small transit instrument
for rating chronometers. The Mallory Act of 1842 provided
for the establishment of a permanent observatory, and the
director was authorized to purchase all such supplies as
were necessary to continue astronomical study. The
observatory was completed in 1,844 and the results of its
first observations were published two years later.
Congress established the Naval Observatory as a separate
agency in 1866. In 1872 a refracting telescope with a
26-inch aperture, then the world's largest, was installed.
The observatory, located at Washington, D.C., has occupied
its present site since 1893.
The Mount Wilson Observatory of the Carnegie Institution
of Washington was built in 1904-05. The observatory's
100-inch reflector telescope opened wider the view of the
heavens, and enabled astronomers to study the movements of
celestial bodies with greater accuracy than ever before.
But a still finer tool was needed, and in 1934 the
200-inch reflector for the Palomar Mountain Observatory
was cast. The six-million-dollar observatory was built, by
the Rockefeller General Education Board for the California
Institute of Technology, which also operates the Mount
Wilson Observatory. The 200-inch telescope makes it
possible to see individual stars 20,000,000 light-years
away and galaxies at least 1,600,000,000 light-years away.
As with earlier instruments, the telescope has about
reached the limit of practical size. Present efforts are
being directed toward application of the electron
microscope to the telescope, to increase the range of
present instruments.
130. Almanacs. —
From the beginning, astronomers have undoubtedly recorded
the results of their observations. Tables computed from
such results have been known for centuries. The work of
Hipparchus, in the second century BC, and Ptolemy, in his
famous
Almagest,
are examples. Then the
Toledan
Tables appeared in AD 1080, and the
Alfonsine Tables in
1252. Even with these later tables, however, few copies
were made, for printing had not yet been invented, and
those that were available were kept in the hands of
astronomers. Not until the 15th century were the first
almanacs printed and made available to the navigator. In
Vienna, in 1457, George Purbach issued the first almanac.
Fifteen years later the Nuremberg Observatory, under
Regiomontanus, issued the first of the ephemerides it
published until 1506. These tables gave the great maritime
explorers of the age the most accurate information
available. In 1474 Abraham Zacuto introduced his
Almanach Perpetuum
(fig. 130a) which contained tables of the sun's
declination in the most useful form yet available to the
mariner. Tabulae Prutenicae, the first tables to be
calculated on Copernican principles, were published by
Erasmus Reinhold in 1551 and gave the mariner a clearer
picture of celestial movements than anything previously
available. The work of Brahe and Kepler at the Uraniburgum
Observatory provided the basis for the publication of the
Rudolphine Tables
in 1627.
Figure 130a. An excerpt from the Portuguese
Regimento do estrolabio
ado quadrante of about 1509,
giving the sun's declination and other data based upon
Zacuto's calculations for month of March.
The first day of spring, the 11th by the Julian
calendar then in use,
is marked by the symbol of Aries, the ram (ϒ).
Still, the information contained in these books was
intended primarily for the use of the astronomer, and the
navigator carried the various tables only that he might
make use of the portions applicable to his work. The first
official almanac,
Connaissance
des Temps, was issued by the French National
Observatory in 1696. Urbane Leverrier was director at the
time. During the 20 years he held the position, the French
Observatory rose to its greatest prominence.
In 1767 the British
Nautical
Almanac was first published. Nevil Mask was then
Astronomer Royal, and he provided the navigator with the
best inform available. The book contained tables of the
sun's declination, and corrections to the observed
altitude of Polaris. The moon's position relative to
other celestial bodies was included at 12-hour intervals,
and lunar distance tables gave the angular distance
between the moon and certain other bodies at three-hour
intervals.
For almost a hundred years the British
Nautical Almanac was
the one used by American navigators, but in 1852 the Depot
of Charts and Instruments published the first
American Ephemeris and
Nautical Almanac, for the year 1855. Early
American almanacs were distinguished by their excessive
detail in some cases and shortage of data of
importance to the navigator in others.
Declination was given to the nearest 0".1 and the
equation of time to the nearest 0".01. Most figures were
given only for noon at Greenwich, and a tedious
interpolation was involved in converting the
information to that at a given time at the longitude of
the observer. Lunar distances were given at three-hour
intervals. Few star data were listed (fig.130b).
Since 1858 the American Nautical Almanac has been printed
without the ephemeris section, that part of value chiefly
to astronomers. Until 1908 the positions of the
brighter stars were given only for January 1st, and in
relation to the meridian of Washington. Beginning in
that year, the apparent places of 55 major stars were
given for the first of each month. In 1913 the tables of
distances were dropped. In 1919 sunrise and sunset tables
were added.
One of the greatest inconveniences involved in using the
old almanacs wa astronomical day, which began at noon of
the civil day of the same date. This system was
abolished in 1925, and the United States adopted the
expression "civil time" to designate time by the new
system. Greenwich hour angle was first published for the
moon in the
Lunar
Ephemeris for Aviators for the last four months
of 1929. This publication became a supplement to the
Nautical Almanac in
1931, and for 1932 they were merged.
FIGURE 130b. Star
data from the 1855 Nautical Almanac.
The annual corrections in declination and right
ascension can be used
to obtain reasonably correct values today.
The
Air Almanac,
designed by Lieutenant Commander P. V. H. Weems, published
for 1933, giving Greenwich hour angle for all bodies
included. For 1934 this information was given in the
Nautical Almanac, and
the
Air Almanac
was discontinued. The first British air almanac was
published for the last quarter of 1937, and modified for
1939 with features followed closely in the first
American Air Almanac,
for 1941. In 1950 a revised
Nautical Almanac appeared, patterned
after the popular
American
Air Almanac. Starting with the 1953 edition, the
British and American air almanacs were combined in a
single publication. In that year the United States
reverted to the expression "mean time" in place of "civil
time." The British and American nautical almanacs have
been combined starting with the edition for 1958.
131. The navigational triangle. — It is customary for
modern navigators to reduce their celestial observations
by solving the triangle whose points are the elevated
pole, the celestial body, and the zenith of the observer.
The sides of this triangle are the polar distance of the
body (codeclination), its zenith distance (coaltitude),
and the polar distance of the zenith (colatitude of the
observer).
Lunar distances.
A spherical triangle was first used at sea in solving
lunar distance problems. Simultaneous or nearly
simultaneous observations were made of the altitudes of
the moon and the sun or a star near the ecliptic, and the
angular distance between the moon and the other
body. The zenith of the observer and the two
celestial bodies formed the vertices of the triangle,
whose sides were the two coaltitudes and the angular
distance between the bodies. By means of a mathematical
calculation the navigator "cleared" this distance of the
effects of refraction and parallax applicable
to each altitude, and other errors. The
corrected value was then used as an argument for entering
the almanac, which gave the true lunar distance from the
sun and several stars at three-hour intervals.
Previously, the navigator had set his watch, which could
be relied upon for short periods, by a meridian transit
observation to determine local apparent time. The equation
of time was obtained from the almanac to establish local
mean time; and this, applied to the Greenwich mean time of
thelunar distance observation, gave the longitude.
The mathematics involved was tedious, and few mariners
were capable of solving the triangle until Nathaniel
Bowditch published his simplified method in 1802 in
The New American Practical
Navigator. Chronometers were reliable by that
time, but their high cost prevented their general use
aboard the majority of naval and merchant ships. Using
Bowditch's method, however, most navigators, for the first
time, could determine their longitude, and so eliminate
the need for parallel sailing and the lost time associated
with it. The popularity of the lunar distance method is
indicated by the fact that tables for its solution were
carried in the I until the second decade of the 20th
century.
The determination of latitude was considered a separate
problem, usually solved by means of a meridian altitude or
an observation of Polaris.
The time sight.
— The theory of the time sight (art. 2106) had been
known to mathematicians since the dawn of spherical
trigonometry, but not until the chronometer was developed
could it be used by mariners.
The time sight made use of the modern navigational
triangle. The codeclination,or polar distance, of the body
could be determined from the almanac. The zenith distance
(coaltitude) was determined by observation. If the
colatitude were known,
three sides of the triangle were available. From these the
meridian angle was computed. The comparison of this
with the Greenwich hour angle from the almanac yielded the
longitude.
The time sight was mathematicall y sound, but the
navigator was not always aware that the longitude
determined was only as accurate as the latitude, and
together they merely formed a point oil is known today as
a line of position. If the observed
body was on the prime vertical, the line of position ran
north and south and a small error in latitude generally
had little effect oil longitude. But when the body was
close to the meridian, a small error in latitude produced
a large error in longitude.
Figure 131. The
first celestial line of position, obtained by Captain
Thomas Sumner in 1837.
The line of position
by celestial observation (art. 1703) was unknown until
discovered in 1837 by 30-year-old Captain Thomas H.
Sumner, a Harvard graduate and son of a United States
Congressman from Massachusetts. The discovery of the
"Sumner line," as it is sometimes called, was considered
by Maury ''the commencement of a new era in navigation."
In Sumner's own words, the discovery took place in this
manner:
Having sailed from Charleston, S.C., 25th
November, 1837, bound to Greenock, a series of heavy
gales from the Westward promised a quick passage; after
passing the Azores, the wind prevailed from the
Southward, with thick weather after passing Longitude
21°W., no observation was had until near the land; but
soundings were had not far, as was supposed, from the
edge of the Bank. The weather was now more boisterous,
and very thick; and the bid still Southerly; arriving
about midnight, 1701 December, within 40 miles, by dead
reckoning, of Tusker light; the wind hauled S.E., true,
making the Irish coast a lee shore; the ship was then
kept close to the wind and several tacks made to
preserve her position as nearly as possible until
daylight, when nothing being in sight, she was kept on
E.N.E. under short sail, with heavy gales; at about 10
A.M. an altitude of the sun was observed, and the
Chronometer time noted; but, having run so far without
any observation, it was plain the Latitude by dead
reckoning was liable to error, and could not be entirely
relied on.
Using, however, this Latitude, in finding the Longitude
by Chronorneter, it was found to put the ship 15' of
Longitude, E. from her position by dead reckoning, which
in Latitude 52°N. is 9 nautical miles; this seemed to
agree tolerably well with the dead reckonuig; but
feeling doubtful of the Latitude, the observatiioonn as
tried with a Latitude 10' further N., finding this
placed the ship E.N.E. 27 nautical miles, of the former
position, it was tried again with a Latitude 20' N. of
the dead reckoning; this also placed the ship still
further E.N.E., and still 27 nautical miles further; these three
positions were then seen to lie in the direction of
Small's light. It then at once appeared, that the
observed altitude must have happened at all the three
points, and at Small's light, and at the ship, at the
same instant of time; and it followed, that Small's
light must bear E.N.E., if the Chronometer was right.
Having been convinced of this truth, the ship was kept
on her course, E.N.E, the wind being still S.E., and in
less than an hour, Small's light was made bearing
E.N.E.E., and close aboard.
In 1843 Sumner published his book,
A New and Accurate Method of
Finding a Ship's Position at Sea by Projection on
Mercator's Chart, which met with great acclaim.
In it he proposed that a single time sight be solved
twice, as he had done (fig. 131), using latitudes somewhat
greater and somewhat less than that arrived at by dead
reckoning, and joining the two positions obtained to form
the line of position. It is significant that Sumner was
able to introduce this revolutionary principle without
seriously upsetting the method by which mariners had been
navigating for years. Perhaps he realized that a better
method could be derived, but almost certainly navigators
would not, have accepted the line of position so readily
had he recommended that they abandon altogether the
familiar time sight.
The Sumner method required the solution of two time sights
to obtain each line of position. Many older navigators
preferred not to draw the lines on their charts but to fix
their position mathematically by a method which Sumner had
also devised and included in his book. This was a tedious
procedure, but a popular one. Lecky recommended the
method, and it was still in use early in the 20th century.
The alternative to working two time sights in the Sumner
method was to dot the azimuth of the body and to draw a
line perpendicular to it through the obtained by working a
single time sight. Several decades after the appears
Sumner's book, this method was made available to
navigators through the publ of accurate azimuth tables,
and the system was widely used until comparatively times.
The 1943 edition of the American Practical Navigator
included example. use. The two-minute azimuth tables still
found on many ships were d+ principally for this purpose.
The mathematical solution for azimuth was not a part of
the time sight.
The St.-Hilaire altitude
difference method. Commander Adolphe-Li Anatole
Mareq de Blonde de Saint-Hilaire, of the French Navy,
introduced the a difference method of determining the line
of position in 1875. This method, long as the "new
navigation," has become the basis of virtually all
celestial navigatigation.
132. Modern methods of
celestial navigation. — Sumner gave the mariner
the line of position; St.-Hilaire the altitude difference
or intercept method. Others who followed these men applied
their principles to provide the navigator with rapid for
determining his position. The new navigational methods
developed by these men, although based upon work done
earlier, are largely a product of the 20th century.
Four hundred years ago Pedro Nunes used a globe to obtain
a fix by two altitudes of the sun, and the azimuth angles.
Fifty years later Robert Hues deterrmined latitude on a
globe by using two observations and the time interval
between them. G. W. Littlehales, of the U S. Navy
Hydrographic Office, advocated using stereographic
projection to obtain computed altitude and azimuth in his
Altitude, Azimuth and
Geographical Position, published in 1906.
Various graphic and mechanical methods have also been
proposed. Of these, only the
Star Altitude Curves of Captain P.V.H.
Weems USN (Ret.), has had usage, and this almost entirely
among aviators. During World War II some were fitted with
a device called an "astrograph," which projected star
altitude from film upon a special plotting sheet. The
curves could be moved to allow earth's rotation. When they
were properly oriented, part of the line of position could
be traced on the plotting sheet. More generally, however,
the navigational has been solved mathematically or by the
use of tables.
Spherical trigonometry is the basis for solving every
navigational triangulation, and until about 80 years ago
the navigator had no choice but to completely solve each
triangle himself. The cosine formula is a fundamental
spherical trigonometry formula by which the navigational
triangle can be conveniently solved. This formula was
commonly used in lunar distance solutions when they were
first introduce because ambiguous results are obtained
when the azimuth is close to 90° or 270°, mathematicians
turned to the haversine, which has the advantage of
increasing numerically from 00° to 180°. The
cosine-haversine formula (art. 2109) was by navigators
until recent years.
Toward the end of the 19th century the "short" methods
began to appear. 1875, A. C. Johnson of the British Royal
Navy published his book
On
Find Latitude and Longitude in Cloudy Weather. No
plotting was involved in Johnson's method, but he made use
of the principle that a single time sight be worked,
rather than the two that Sumner proposed, and the line of
position drawn through the point thus determined.
In 1879 Percy L. H. Davis, of the British Nautical Almanac
Office, and Captain J.E. Davis collaborated on it Sun's
True Bearing or Azimuth table, which enabled the navigator
to lay down a line of position using a computed
azimuth.
Chronometer
Tables, published by Percy Davis 20 years later,
covered latitudes up to 50° and gave local hour angle
values for selected altitudes to one minute of arc. In
1905 his
Requisite
Tables were issued, enabling the mariner to
"solve spherical triangles with three variable
errors." These were the first of a large number
of "short" solutions which followed the work of
Marcq St.-Hilaire. Generally, they consist of adaptations
of the formulas of spherical trigonometry, and tables of
logarithms in a convenient arrangement. It is customar y
for such methods to divide the navigational triangle into
two right spherical triangles by dropping a perpendicular
from one vertex to the side opposite. In some methods,
partial solutions are made and the results tabulated.
Aquino and Braga of Brazil; Ball, Comrie, Davis, and Smart
of England; Bertin, Hugon, and Souillagouet of France;
Fuss of Germany; Ogura and Yonemura of Japan; Blackburn$
of New Zealand; Pinto of Portugal; Garcia of Spain; and
Ageton, Driesonstok, Gingrich, Rust, and Weems of the
United States are but a few of those providing such
solutions. Although "inspection tables" have largely
superseded them, many of these "short" methods are still
in use, kept alive largely by the compactness of their
tables and the universality of their application. They are
an intermediate step between the tedious earlier solutions
and the fast tabulated ones, and they encouraged the
navigator to work to a practical precision. The earlier
custom of working to a precision not justified by the
accuracy of the information used created a false sense of
security in the mind of sonic navigators, especially those
of little experience.
A book of tabulated solutions, from which an answer can be
extracted by inspection, is not a new idea. Lord Kelvin,
generally considered the father of modern navigational
methods, expressed interest in such a method. However,
solution of the hundreds of thousands of triangles
involved would have made the project too costly if done by
hand. Modern electronic computers have provided a
practical means of preparing the tables. In 1936 the first
published volume of H.O. Pub. No. 214 was made available,
and later H.O. Pub. No. 249 was provided for air
navigators. British editions of both these sets of tables
have been published, and a Spanish edition of H.O. Pub.
to. 214 is being published.
Electronic Navigation
133. Electricity.
— Twenty-five hundred years ago Thales of Miletus
commented upon basic electrical phenomena, but more than
two millenniums were to pass before men first approached a
clear understanding of electricity and the uses to which
it could be put.
Until about 1682 the only known method of creating
electricity was by rubbing glass with silk or amber with
wool. Then Otto von Guericke of Magdeburg invented an
"electric machine" and made possible the creation of
electricity for experimental work. The Leyden jar, the
electrical condenser (or machine) commonly used today, had
its origin in 1745 when its principle was accidentall y
discovered independently by P. van Mlusschenbroek, of the
University of Leyden, and von Kleist.
Stephen Gray, about 1729, demonstrated the difference
between conductors and non-conductors, or insulators, and
ten years later Hawkesbee and DuFay, workingindependently,
each discovered the positive and negative qualities of
electricity.
In the middle of the 18th century Sir William Watson of
England, developrt of the Leyden jar in essentially its
present form, sent electricity more than two miles by
wire. Whether Watson was aware of the tremendous
possibilities his experiment demonstrated is not known.
Twenty-five years later, about 1774, Lesage devised what
is believed to have been the first method of electrical
communication. He had a separate wire for each
letter of the alphabet and momentarily charged the
apppropriate wire to send each letter.
A German scholar, Francis Aepinus (1728-1802), was the
first to recognize the reciprocal relationship of
electricity and magnetism. In 1837 Karl Gauss and Wilhelm
Weber collaborated in inventing a reflecting galvanometer
for use in telegraphic work, which was the forerunner of
the galvanometer at one time employed in submarine
signaling. Michael Faraday (1791-1867), in a lifetime of
experimental work, contributed most of what is known today
in the field of electromagnetic inductiduction. In
1864 James Clerk Maxwell of Edinburgh made public his
electromagnetic theory of light. Many consider it the
greatest single advancement in man's knowledge of
electricity.
134. Electronics. — In 1887 Heinrich Hertz provided the
proof of Maxwell's theory by producing electromagnetic
waves and showing that they could be reflected. A
decade later Joseph J. Thomson discovered the electron and
so provided the basis for the development of the vacuum
tube by Fleming and DeForest,. In 1899 R.A. Fessenders
pointed out that directional reception of radio signals
was possible if aingle coil or frame aerial was used as
the receiving antenna. In 1895 Guglielmo Marconi
transmitted a "wireless" message a distance of about one
mile. By 1901 he was able to communicate between stations
more than 2,000 miles apart. The following year Arthur
Edwin Kennelly and Oliver Heaviside introduced the theory
of an ionizes layer in the atmosphere and its ability to
reflect radio waves. Pulse ranging had its origin in
1925 when Gregory Breit and Merle A. Tuve used this
principle to measure the height of the ionosphere.
135. Application of
electronics to navigation. — Perhaps the first
application of electronics to navigation was the
transmission of radio time signals (art. 1909) in 1903,
thus permitting the mariner to check his chronometer at
sea. Telegraphic time signals had been sent since 1865,
providing a means of checking the chronometer in various
ports.
Next, radio broadcasts providing navigational warnings,
begun in 1907 by the U.S. Navy Hydrographic Office, helped
increase the safety of navigation at sea.
By the latter part of World War I the directional
properties of a loop antenna were successfully utilized in
the radio direction finder (art. 1202). The first
radiobeacon was installed in 1921.
Early 20th century experiments by Behm and Lanngevin led
to the development, by the U. S. Navy, of the first
practical echo sounder (art. 619) in 1922.
As early as 1904, Christian I3ulsmeyer, a German engineer,
obtained patents in several countries on a proposed method
of utilizing the reflection of radio waves as an obstacle
detector and a navigational aid to ships. Apparently, the
device was never constructed. In 1922 Marconi said,
It seems to me that it should be possible to
design apparatus by means of which a ship could radiate
or project a divergent beam of these rays
(electromagnetic waves) in any desired direction, which
rays if coming across a metallic object, such as another
ship, would be reflected back to a treceiver screened
from the local transmitter on the sending ship, and
thereby immediately reveal the presence and bearing of
the other ship in fog or thick weather.
In that same year of 1922 two scientists, Dr. A. Hoyt
Taylor and Leo C Young, testing a communication system at
the Naval Aircraft Radio Laboratory at Anacostia, D.C.,
noted fluctuations in the signals when ships passed
between stations
on opposite sides of the Potomac River. Although the
potential value of the discovery was recognized,
work on its exploitation did not begin until March 1934,
when Young suggested to Dr. Robert M. Page, an assistant,
that this might bear further investigation. By December,
Page had constructed a pulse-signal device that
determined the positions of aircraft. This was the
first radar (art. 1208). In the spring of 1935 the
British, unaware of American efforts, began work in this
field, and developed radar independently. In 1937 the USS
Leary tested the
first seagoing radar. In 1940 United States and British
scientists combined their efforts, resulting in more rapid
progress. Probably no scientific or industrial development
in history expanded so rapidly in all phases — research,
development, design, production, trials, and training —
and on such a scale. In 1945, at the close of hostilities
of World War II, radar was made available for commercial
use.
Meanwhile, the pulse technique upon which radar is based
was utilized for other navigational aids. Work on loran
(art. 1302) began at the Radiation Laboratory at the
'Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1941. By the end
of 1942 the first stations had been established, in the
North Atlantic. Installations in the Aleutians and the
South Pacific soon followed. With the termination of
hostilities, loran, like radar, was made available for
public use. A somewhat similar system, gee (art. 1308),
was developed simultaneously in Great Britain, Another
pulse system, shoran (art. 1213), was developed by the
United States for bombing through undereast. Following
World War II this aid was further perfected and used for
measurement of distances in surveying. A lower-frequency,
longer-range system called electronic position indicator
(EPI) (art. 1213) was developed by the U.S. Coast and
Geodetic Survey for use in locating survey ships a
considerable distance offshore. Another American
development, Raydist (arts. 1214, 1311), is used in
accurate measurement of distance for surveying and for
ship speed trials. Raydist; Decca (art. 1309), a British
hyperbolic system of high accuracy used for navigation and
surveying; and lorac (art. 1310), a somewhat similar
American system, use continuous waves, rather than pulses.
Not only are such devices improving the accuracy of
charted features, but they may well apply directly to
geodesy, permitting a more accurate determination of the
size and shape of the earth, for they make possible
measurement of distances across previously inaccessible
terrain.
A rotating electronic beam was utilized during World War
II in the German navigation system called sonne (art.
1206), later further perfected by the British under the
name tunsol (art. 1206).
In air navigation electronics was used to develop an
automatic direction finder. Four-course radio ranges (art.
1207) and the more recent vortac (art. 1207) have been
used to mark the federal airways. Electronics has various
applications to traffic control in congested areas, and in
low-visibility approach systems permitting landings under
conditions of reduced horizontal and vertical visibility.
Electronics permits measurement of weather conditions at
various heights and distances from observing stations, and
the transmission of observations from isolated stations to
weather centrals. Radar is permitting study of the
structure and movement of thunderstorms.
High-speed electronic computers make practicable the
modern inspection table, and rapidly perform lengthy
computations which make it possible for loran tables and
chartsto become available to the navigator almost as soon
as new stations are operational.
The application of electronics to navigation is almost
limitless. Many systems not mentioned have been suggested,
and undoubtedly new ones will be operational in the
future.
136. Navigation
has come a long way, but thero-is no evidence that it is
nearing the end of its development. Progress will continue
as long as man remains unsatisfied with the means at his
disposal.
Perhaps the best guides to the future are the desires of
the present, for a want usually precedes an acquisition.
Pytheas and his contemporaries undoubtedly dreamed of
devices to indicate direction and distance. The 16th
century navigator had these, and wanted a method of
determining longitude at sea. The 18th century
navigatorcould determine longitude, but found the task a
tedious one, and perhaps longed to be freed from the
drudgery of navigation. The modern navigator is still
seeking further release from the work of navigation, and
now wants to be freed from the limitations of weather.
There is little probability of further major development
in the simplification of tables for celestial navigation.
Further release from the work of navigation is more likely
to come through another approach — automation This process
might be said to have started with the application of
electronics to computation. The direct use of electronics
in navigation is more spectacular, but in this it is
vulnerable to jamming by an unfriendly power, intentional
or accidental mechanical damage, natural failure,
propagation limitations in certain areas and at certain
times, and accuracy limitations at long ranges.
In the future, it is likely that electronics will be
applied increasingly as an additional source of energy to
extend the range of usefulness of other methods, rather
than to replace them. To date electronics has been related
primarily to piloting, extending its range far to sea, and
permitting its use in periods of foul weather. In the
future it can be expected to play an increasingly
important role in the field of dead reckoning and
celestial navigation. Inertial and Doppler systems (art:.
809) are under development for use in guided missiles
and aircraft, and a geomagnetic electrokinetograph (GEK)
(art. 611) has been developed to measure the cross
component of a current by means of two electrodes towed
astern a vessel, utilizing the earth's magnetic field.
Radio astronomy (art. 1102) may provide a practical means
of determining position astronomically through overcast.
Star trackers and electronic recorders and computer, may
further extend the application of electronics to celestial
navigation.
It is not inconceivable that a fix may some day be
automatically and continuously available, perhaps on
latitude and longitude dials. However, when this is
accomplished, by one or a combination of systems, it will
be but a short additional step to feed this information
electronically to a pen which will automatically trace the
path of the vessel across a chart. Another An step would
be to feed the information electrically to a device to
control the movements of the vessel, so that it would
automatically follow a predetermined track.
When this has been accomplished, new problems will
undoubtedly arise, for it is not likely that the time will
ever come when there will be no problems to be solved.
137. The navigator.
It might seem drat when complete automation has been
achieved, all of the work of the navigator will have been
eliminated. However, advance planning of route and
schedule will undoubtedly require human intelligence. So
will the interpretation of results en route, and the
alteration of schedule when circumstances render this
desirable. I milers the automatic system can he made 100
percent reliable it remote prospect for the foreseeable
future it will need checking from time to time, and
provision will have to he made for other, perhaps cruder,
methods in the event of failure.
Conclusion
Until such time as mechanization may become complete and
perfect, the prudent navigator will not permit himself to
become wholly dependent upon "black boxes" which may fail
at crucial moments, or ready-made solutions that may not
be available when most needed. Today and in the future, as
in the past, a knowledge of fundamental principles is
essential to adequate navigation. If the navigator
contents himself with the ability to read dials or look up
answers in a book, he will be of questionable value. His
future, if he has one, will be in jeopardy.
Human beings who entrust their lives to the skill and
knowledge of a navigator are entitled to expect him to be
capable of handling any reasonable emergency. When his
customary tools or methods are denied him, they have a
right to expect him to have the necessary ability to take
them safely to their destination, however elementary the
knowledge and means available to him.
The wise navigator uses all reliable aids available to
him, and seeks to understand their uses and limitations.
He learns to evaluate his various aids when he has means
for checking their accuracy and reliability, so that he
can adequately interpret their indications when his
resources are limited. He stores in his mind the
fundamental knowledge that may be needed in an emergency.
Machines may reflect much of the science of navigation,
but only a competent human can practice the art of
navigation.
References
Collinder, Per.
A
History of Marine Navigation. Tr. Maurice
Michael. New York, St. Martin's, 1955.
Rawson, J.B.
A History
of the Practice of Navigation. Glasgow, Brown,
1951.
Petze, C.L., Jr.
The
Evolution of Celestial Navigation. Vol. 26, Ideal
Series. New York, Motor Boating, 1948.
Stewart, J.Q. and Pierce, N.L. "The History of
Navigation,"
Marine and
Air Navigation (Boston, Ginn, 1944). Chap. 29.
Taylor, E.G.R.
The
Mathematical Practitioners of Tudor and Stuart England.
London, Cambridge University Press, 1955.
Wroth, L.C.
Some
American Contributions to the Art of Navigation,
1519-1802. Providence, John Carter Brown Library,
1947.
In addition, articles pertaining to the history of
navigation are frequently carried in certain periodicals,
including:
"The American Neptune." (Salem)
"The Journal of the Institute of Navigation." (London)
"The Nautical Magazine." (Glasgow)
"Navigation, Journal of the Institute of Navigation." (Los
Angeles)
"Navigation, Revue Technique de Navigation Maritime et
Aerienne." (Paris)
"United States Naval Institute Proceedings." (Annapolis)